Each new edition of Attacking Faulty Reasoning gives me an opportunity to write a T. Edward Damer is Professor of Philosophy, the Rowlett Chair of Creative. However, ATTACKING FAULTY REASONING goes beyond most critical thinking books, providing students with not just a definition and. This text is designed to help students construct and evaluate arguments.
|Published (Last):||12 May 2014|
|PDF File Size:||3.73 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Fallacies Logic books books Philosophy books.
What is a Fallacy? Edward Damer Limited preview – Paperbackpages. Nathaniel Bluedorn – – Christian Faulth. Very organizer book I sure will go back time from time to consult when I need make a good argument and decision in my life. Media content referenced within the product description or the product text may not be available in the ebook version. The structural criterion requires that one who argues for or against a position should use an argument that meets the fundamental structural requirements of a well-formed argument, using premises that are compatible with one another, that do not contradict the conclusion, that do not assume the truth of the conclusion, and that are not involved in any faulty deductive inference.
Sign in to use this feature.
Attacking Faulty Reasoning – Wikipedia
Leo Groarke – – Oxford University Press. The Metaphoric Fallacy to a Deductive Inference. For each fallacy, the text gives suggestions about how to address reasojing to “attack” the fallacy when it is encountered. No trivia or quizzes yet.
Added to PP index Total downloads 47, of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 4of 2, How can I increase my downloads?
Attacking Faulty Reasoning – T. Edward Damer – Google Books
I don’t whether the advanced editions have been modified. The acceptability criterion requires that one who presents an argument for or against a position should attempt to use reasons that are likely to be accepted by a rationally mature person and that meet the standard criteria of acceptability.
Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice 30 2: Every chapter explains the fallacies with useful and daily examples, and it ends with good exercises.
It begins with an informative introduction about types of arguments, what is fallacy? The relevance criterion requires that one who presents an argument for or against a position should attempt to set forth only reasons that are directly related to the merit of the position at issue. Georg Spielthenner – – Acta Analytica 22 2: Tarah rated it it was amazing May 21, One could wish for examples from all points of view rather than using conservatives and theists are his examples, particularly since the arguments he attacks for those points of view are not genuinely held by any but the uninformed and unlearned.
What is an Argument?
Fallacies That Violate the Structural Criterion. If only I could everyone to read this. Kurt rated it it was ok Apr 18, This theoretically sound handbook addresses more than 60 common fallacies with the help of over memorable, timely examples. Fallacies That Violate the Sufficiency Criterion.
Be the first to ask a question about Attacking Faulty Reasoning. The overriding purpose of the text is to help the students recognize when they construct or encounter a good or successful argument of a particular action or belief.
Stephen Kelley rated it it was ok Aug 27, Brian rated it liked it Mar 26, Edward Damer received attwcking Ph. Julie rated it liked it Jul 05, Attacking Faulty Reasoning  is a textbook on logical fallacies by T.
A Logic of Practical Reasoning. Refresh and try again.
Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments
Retrieved from ” https: Want to Read saving…. Sign in Create an account. Google Books no proxy Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
Larry Wright – – Oxford University Press.